Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Deck Wins | luffydochapeudepalha | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
| Red Deck Wins | kablewire | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
| Red Deck Wins | numberonenoob | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769073 |
| Red Deck Wins | pedrastone | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769073 |
| Red Deck Wins | comrade1312 | 6-2 | None |
| Red Deck Wins | holdtheelle | 6-2 | None |
| Red Deck Wins | pedrastone | 6-2 | None |
| Red Deck Wins | lbbl | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Mice , Goblins , Gruul Aggro , Gruul Delirium , Gruul Leyline , Gruul Surprise , Izzet Spellslingers , Jeskai Convoke
Meta Performance Analysis
Case of the Crimson Pulse ranks #281 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 69%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 62.1%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Case of the Crimson Pulse is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 13.53 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.2%. Case of the Crimson Pulse has a win rate of 72.0%, making it 2.9% worse than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pawpatch Formation | Instant | 5 | 58.1% | 0 |
| Questing Druid | Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure | 6 | 43.6% | 0 |
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 9 | 40.1% | 1 |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 16 | 36.1% | 0 |
| Scorching Shot | Sorcery | 6 | 35.0% | 0 |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 20 | 33.4% | 1 |
| Monstrous Rage | Instant | 29 | 33.0% | 3 |
| Torch the Tower | Instant | 33 | 32.7% | 1 |
| Emberheart Challenger | Creature — Mouse Warrior | 22 | 32.2% | 3 |
| Kellan, Planar Trailblazer | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout | 7 | 32.2% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Case of the Crimson Pulse than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Questing Druid | Creature — Human Druid // Instant — Adventure | 2 | 6 | 82.8% | 74.1% | +8.6% |
| Monastery Swiftspear | Creature — Human Monk | 1 | 16 | 78.4% | 75.7% | +2.7% |
| Pyroclasm | Sorcery | 2 | 14 | 76.8% | 74.8% | +2.0% |
| Obliterating Bolt | Sorcery | 2 | 11 | 71.4% | 70.9% | +0.6% |
| Lithomantic Barrage | Sorcery | 1 | 63 | 72.8% | 72.4% | +0.4% |
| Hired Claw | Creature — Lizard Mercenary | 1 | 64 | 72.5% | 72.0% | +0.4% |
| Manifold Mouse | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 2 | 66 | 72.8% | 72.6% | +0.2% |
| Lightning Strike | Instant | 2 | 60 | 72.7% | 72.5% | +0.1% |
| Screaming Nemesis | Creature — Spirit | 3 | 66 | 72.1% | 72.0% | +0.1% |
| Heartfire Hero | Creature — Mouse Soldier | 1 | 66 | 72.8% | 72.7% | +0.1% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Deck Wins | 305 | 22.1% | 52.0% |
| Boros Burn | 119 | 30.4% | 45.5% |
| Gruul Aggro | 97 | 4.7% | 42.3% |
| Boros Auras | 27 | 40.9% | 71.1% |
| Naya Aggro | 9 | 69.2% | 43.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.